Proof of Voluntariness
A spouse advised by their own counsel cannot easily claim later that they signed without understanding or choice.
The Core ProtectionIt sounds backwards: hiring a second attorney to review the prenup makes the agreement stronger for both of you. But that is exactly how it works. When each person was advised by their own counsel, the most common challenge to a prenup dies before it starts.
First call is a conversation, not a commitment. · By Alisa Chunephisal, Esq.
No Virginia statute requires each spouse to have a lawyer for a prenup to be valid. But independent review is one of the best protections an agreement can have, because the main legal attack on a prenup is that it was not signed voluntarily under Virginia Code § 20-151(A)(1). A spouse who was advised by their own counsel has a very hard time making that claim.
Here is the honest picture: a prenup is a negotiation between two people whose interests are not identical, however much they love each other. The structure of the review should match that reality.
A prenup gives things to one spouse that the other gives up, and the reverse. That makes the two of you, for this one document, parties with different interests. An attorney can ethically represent only one of you in that negotiation. When a couple shares a single lawyer, that lawyer represents one spouse, and the other is unrepresented whether they realize it or not. The unrepresented spouse is the one who, years later, says: I did not understand what I was signing, and nobody was looking out for me. That sentence is the opening line of almost every prenup challenge we have ever seen.
The strongest attack on a Virginia prenup is involuntariness under Va. Code § 20-151(A)(1): the claim that a spouse signed under pressure, without understanding, or without real choice. Independent counsel answers that claim before it is made. A spouse who had their own lawyer received an explanation of every term, had the chance to negotiate, and chose to sign with full understanding. Courts see that history and the involuntariness argument loses its footing. The same is true of the unconscionability attack: terms that were reviewed and negotiated by counsel on both sides are far harder to paint as one-sided impositions.
This is why the spouse with more assets should want the other spouse to have a good lawyer. It feels counterintuitive and it is the most protective money in the whole process. The agreement you are paying to create is only as strong as the other side's ability to challenge it is weak. Independent review is what makes it weak.
Independent review is not adversarial and it is usually not long. The reviewing attorney reads the draft, walks their client through what each term means and what rights it gives up, compares the terms against the disclosure, raises any concerns, and negotiates adjustments where needed. Most reviews produce a handful of reasonable edits and a client who signs with confidence. The agreement then typically recites that each party was represented by counsel of their own choosing, which becomes one more piece of armor in the document itself. Budget a few weeks for this phase. It is the step that turns a document into a settled question.
Virginia Code § 20-151(A)(1) makes a premarital agreement unenforceable if it was not executed voluntarily. Independent counsel is not required by the statute, but it is the most direct proof of voluntariness a couple can build: each spouse advised, each term explained, each signature an informed choice.
The second lawyer is not an obstacle to the agreement. They are part of what makes it permanent.
A spouse advised by their own counsel cannot easily claim later that they signed without understanding or choice.
The Core ProtectionThe reviewing attorney translates each clause into plain English: what it gives, what it waives, what it costs.
Informed ConsentFresh eyes compare the terms against the disclosure and flag anything that reads as one-sided before it becomes a problem.
Caught EarlyReasonable edits proposed and resolved now, between lawyers, instead of fought over in a courtroom later.
Edits, Not LawsuitsThe agreement states that each party had counsel of their own choosing, armor written into the document itself.
In the DocumentTwo people who each understood what they signed start the marriage with the question genuinely settled.
Actually SettledThe protection comes from genuine, unhurried review. A rubber stamp gives you the cost without the benefit.
"The cheapest way to lose a prenup is to save money on the other side's lawyer. Their attorney is your insurance policy."
When I represent the spouse with more assets, I tell them the same thing every time: insist that your partner gets their own lawyer, give them time to use that lawyer, and welcome the edits that come back. Every change negotiated now is an argument that can never be made later. And if your partner picks their own attorney, even better. The more genuine their representation, the more permanent your agreement. Independence is the entire point. Protect it.
These are the questions we hear most about separate counsel. If you have a different one, we are happy to answer it directly.
No statute requires it. A Virginia prenup needs to be in writing, signed by both parties, entered voluntarily, and supported by fair disclosure. But independent counsel for each spouse is strongly recommended, because the most common legal attack on a prenup is involuntariness under Va. Code § 20-151(A)(1), and a spouse who had their own lawyer can rarely make that claim stick.
No. A prenup is a negotiation between two people with different interests, and an attorney can ethically represent only one side of it. When a couple shares one lawyer, one spouse is unrepresented, and that spouse becomes the natural source of a future challenge. Two attorneys is not a sign of distrust. It is the structure that matches what the document actually is.
Couples handle it differently, and either way can work. Often the spouse with more assets offers to cover the cost of the other's review, which is fine as long as the choice of attorney genuinely belongs to the represented spouse. What matters is independence: each spouse freely chooses their counsel and that attorney answers only to them.
That is the process working, not failing. Most reviews produce a handful of reasonable edits, resolved between the attorneys in days. Every change negotiated before the wedding is an argument that can never be raised after it. An agreement that survived genuine review on both sides is the strongest kind there is.
We draft agreements, and we review agreements drafted by someone else's counsel. Either way, you will understand every word before you sign. Three offices across Northern Virginia, one phone number.

