Can One Parent Put a Child in Therapy Without the Other Agreeing in Virginia?

McLean, Fairfax County · Legal Custody

Your child is not doing well. The school has mentioned it, or you can simply see it, and you found someone good who has an opening. And the other parent has said no, or has said nothing at all, which is functionally the same thing while a child struggles. Here is the answer: starting ongoing mental health treatment for a child is generally a major decision, which under joint legal custody in Virginia requires both parents to agree. One parent usually cannot begin therapy alone, but there are real options when the other parent refuses, and acting unilaterally is not one of them. In McLean, this is the decision fight I see turn bitter fastest, because both parents usually believe they are protecting the child.

By Corrie Sirkin, Esq. · Founding Partner, NOVA Legal Professionals

This article is one part of our larger guide to child custody in Virginia. For the full picture, start with our cornerstone, Child Custody in Virginia. Here, I will focus on medical and mental health decisions.

Where the line sits between major and routine

Not every medical choice requires agreement, and treating them all as shared decisions is exhausting and unnecessary.

Decision	Shared under joint legal custody?	Notes
Starting ongoing counseling or therapy	Usually yes	A course of treatment rather than a single visit
Psychiatric medication	Yes	Among the most consequential decisions parents make together
A psychological or developmental evaluation	Usually yes	Frequently the first flashpoint, before treatment is even proposed
Non emergency surgery or an ongoing treatment plan	Yes	Changing course on an existing plan is also a major decision
Choosing or changing the pediatrician	Usually yes	Continuity of care matters and duelling providers cause real harm
A sick visit, a check up, a vaccination on schedule	No	Routine care belongs to the parent who has the child
Emergency treatment	No	Either parent may consent, with a duty to notify the other immediately

If your order does not define this, define it. Our page on parenting plans covers the drafting, and a plan that names the categories prevents most of these arguments before they start.

Why this particular fight gets so bitter

It helps to understand what each parent is usually thinking, because both positions are more sympathetic than they look from the other side.

The parent seeking treatment often sees a child in genuine distress and experiences the refusal as indifference. The parent refusing often suspects the therapy is being sought to build a case, or worries the child will be shaped into saying things about them, or believes the difficulty is situational and will pass without a clinical label attached to their child.

Occasionally one of those suspicions is correct. Usually neither parent is acting badly, and what you have is two people with different thresholds for professional help, arguing through a legal document. Recognizing that changes how you approach the conversation, and it is worth trying before you approach it as a legal problem.

What to do when the other parent refuses

There is a sequence here, and skipping steps is what turns a solvable problem into a filing.

1. Put the request in writing, specifically. Name the concern, what you have observed, who raised it, and what you are proposing. Vague requests get vague refusals.
2. Offer choice on the provider. A great deal of resistance is really about the therapist rather than the therapy. Propose three and let the other parent pick, or ask them to propose their own.
3. Bring in a neutral voice. A recommendation from the pediatrician or the school counselor carries weight that your opinion cannot, and it takes the argument out of the space between the two of you.
4. Start smaller. An evaluation or a few sessions with a defined review point is easier to agree to than open ended treatment.
5. Try mediation. Custody mediation resolves a great many of these faster and far cheaper than a hearing.
6. Then go to court, asking for authority on this specific decision rather than reopening everything.

Document every step. A parent who can show four written requests, an offer to let the other parent choose the provider, and a pediatrician’s recommendation is in an extremely strong position. One who shows up saying the other parent is being unreasonable is not.

The therapist is not your witness

This deserves its own section because it is where well meaning parents do the most damage.

A child’s therapist exists to help the child. The moment they become a source of evidence, the relationship changes: the child senses it, the clinician becomes guarded, and the therapeutic value drops sharply. Many good therapists will decline to work with a family at all if they anticipate being pulled into litigation, which means a parent who tries this can lose access to the person their child needed.

There is also a practical point. Treating clinicians are generally reluctant to offer opinions about custody, because they have only heard one side of a family and their role is treatment rather than evaluation. A therapist pressed for a custody opinion will usually say so.

If you need a professional assessment for the case, that is a different instrument: a custody evaluation, or the involvement of a guardian ad litem, both of which are designed for the purpose. Keep your child’s therapy for your child.

Records, and how a parent gets shut out

Virginia generally provides that either parent is entitled to access their minor child’s health records, subject to limited exceptions. In practice, exclusion usually happens by administrative default rather than by anyone’s decision.

One parent books the appointments, so the practice has one address and one phone number. The portal is set up under one account. The intake paperwork names one parent. None of that is a legal ruling, and all of it produces a parent who genuinely does not know what is happening with their child’s care.

Fix it structurally. Both parents listed with every provider, both with portal access, both on the appointment reminder list, and an obligation in the plan on each parent to forward anything received separately. There are narrow situations where access is limited, particularly around some adolescent care, so confirm the specifics with the provider rather than assuming the general rule covers everything.

When the medical domain needs a tiebreaker

If this has happened once, it will happen again. The structural fix is to stop requiring agreement on everything.

Joint legal custody can be preserved while assigning final decision making authority in defined domains, so one parent holds medical and mental health with a duty to consult the other first, and the other holds education. Both parents keep information rights and input. What disappears is the veto that leaves a child untreated while two adults disagree.

Where the pattern is severe, or where one parent is simply unreachable on these questions, sole legal custody over medical decisions may be the honest answer, or a modification restructuring the authority. That is a higher bar and it needs a record showing joint authority has actually failed rather than merely been inconvenient.

How Virginia law treats it

Virginia defines joint legal custody as an arrangement in which both parents retain joint responsibility for the care and control of the child and joint authority to make decisions concerning the child, even though the child’s primary residence may be with only one parent. Custody determinations are made according to the best interests of the child under the statutory factors, with no presumption in favor of either parent, and the court may award joint legal custody, sole custody, or a combination and may structure decision making authority within a joint award. Either parent is generally entitled to access their minor child’s academic and health records, subject to limited exceptions. A McLean case is generally heard in the Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court.

How we help in McLean

We handle legal custody disputes for parents across McLean, Great Falls, Tysons, and Pimmit Hills. Treatment decisions bring more of these to us than anything except school, and they usually arrive with a child who has been waiting while the adults disagree.

Our approach is to move quickly on the immediate question and structurally on the recurring one. That means documenting the requests, offering the other parent real choice on the provider, and seeking authority on the specific decision if it comes to that. Then, separately, building a decision making structure with a tiebreaker so the next question does not take three months. You can read more about the areas we serve on our McLean family law page and our Fairfax County overview.

Frequently Asked Questions