Document The Work History
Past jobs, past earnings, degrees, and licenses. Capacity arguments start with what the record already shows.
When a spouse earns less than they could on purpose, Virginia courts do not have to take the smaller paycheck at face value. The court can impute income, setting support on earning capacity instead. Here is how it works, in both directions.
First call is a conversation, not a commitment. · By Corrie Sirkin, Esq.
Imputed income means the court assigns a spouse an income based on what they could reasonably earn, not what they currently do, when their unemployment or under-employment is voluntary. It can apply to either spouse, the one paying or the one asking. The party asking the court to impute income carries the burden of proving the capacity is real.
Spousal support runs on the incomes of two people. That creates a temptation: earn less, on paper, and the number moves your way. A payor who downshifts careers pays less. A recipient who stays out of work receives more. Imputation is the court's answer to that temptation. When a spouse is voluntarily unemployed or under-employed, the court can set support using the income they are capable of earning.
The key word is voluntary. A spouse who quits a good job during the case, refuses suitable work, or takes a role far below their qualifications without a good reason can have income imputed. A spouse who lost a job in a layoff, who cannot work for documented health reasons, or who stays home because a child's needs genuinely require it is in a different position. The court looks at why the income is what it is.
The spouse asking the court to impute income has to prove it. That means showing the other spouse's work history, qualifications, and the jobs realistically available to them. It is not enough to say they could earn more. You have to show what, where, and how much, with evidence.
Work history and past earnings are the starting point. In contested cases, a vocational expert can evaluate a spouse's skills and the local job market and testify to a concrete earning capacity. The stronger and more specific the evidence, the more likely the court is to use the imputed number.
Earning capacity is written into the statute. Virginia Code § 20-107.1(E) requires the court to weigh each party's earning capacity, skills, education, and job opportunities, and Virginia case law allows income to be imputed to a spouse who is voluntarily unemployed or under-employed.
Imputation cases are evidence cases. Whether you are raising the argument or answering it, this is the work that decides it.
Past jobs, past earnings, degrees, and licenses. Capacity arguments start with what the record already shows.
A vocational expert can testify to concrete earning capacity in the local market. It is often the strongest proof there is.
Real openings, real salaries, within reach of the spouse's skills. Specifics persuade. Generalities do not.
If you earn less for good reasons, health, a child's needs, a joint family decision, put those reasons into evidence.
Calculate support at actual income and at the imputed figure, so you negotiate knowing what is truly at stake.
Before you accuse, audit yourself. Imputation arguments have a way of coming back across the table.
The whole question is whether the lower income is a choice. Here is what pushes the court toward imputing, and what holds it back.
"If you stepped back from work for good reasons, you deserve to have those reasons heard, not assumed away. And if your former spouse is hiding behind a smaller paycheck, the law sees that too. Either way, I will make sure the court looks at the truth of it."
Imputation runs in both directions, so run your own numbers honestly before you point at theirs. I see this from both sides. Clients who want income imputed to a spouse are sometimes earning below their own capacity, and the argument comes back at them. Before we raise it, we look hard at your work history too. And if you are the one who stepped back from a career for real reasons, children, health, a family decision made together, we put those reasons into evidence rather than letting the other side define them.
Spousal support questions rarely stand alone. Here is how this topic connects to the rest of our spousal support work. Start anywhere, and we will help you find the rest.
These are the questions we hear most about this part of spousal support. If yours is not here, we are glad to answer it on a first call.
It is income the court assigns to a spouse based on earning capacity rather than actual earnings, used when the spouse is voluntarily unemployed or under-employed. Support is then calculated using the imputed figure.
Yes. A payor who voluntarily earns less to shrink support, and a recipient who stays out of suitable work to inflate it, can both have income imputed. The doctrine protects against manipulation on both sides.
The spouse asking for imputation. You must show the other spouse's qualifications, work history, and realistic job opportunities, often with vocational expert testimony. A bare claim that they could earn more is not enough.
An involuntary layoff, documented health limits, or genuinely staying home for a child's needs generally do not trigger imputation. A voluntary quit, refusing suitable work, or downshifting without cause generally can.
Whether you suspect your spouse is earning below capacity or you are being accused of it, bring us the work history and we will tell you honestly where the case stands. Three offices across Northern Virginia, one phone number.

